The Kind of Antisemitism that Worries Me the Most

Mike Huckabee and Tucker Carlson

Honestly? It’s becoming a bit confusing. What should the Jewish people do about antisemitism? A variety of opinions have been expressed. Some of which contradict each other.

Clearly, antisemitism has spiked considerably since October 7. Most of it seems to be handled fairly well by Jewish advocacy groups like the Anti-Defamation League and by law enforcement. Of course, we could use a lot more of the latter. But it is not for lack of concern or willingness to defend us. It is probably a question of whether there are enough law enforcement officers to handle it. Not because of anti-Jewish bias.

What concerns me most, though, is the antisemitism being spread by influential political commentators and other public figures who use their Christianity to make their case. The fact that they invoke their religion is what makes this so troubling.

Tablet editor Liel Leibovitz expresses this concern well. The following is excerpted from 'Letter to a Catholic Friend.:

“I’m a Catholic,” Carrie Prejean Boller, the now-former member of the White House Religious Liberty Commission, thundered as she took the mic at a hearing last week, “and Catholics do not embrace Zionism, just so you know.”

Boller then proceeded to grill each member of the committee on whether they considered criticism of Israel to be antisemitic, showing little interest in their considered and nuanced responses and repeatedly accusing Israel of genocide. She also used her time in the limelight to defend her friend and fellow Catholic convert Candace Owens, arguing that the popular podcaster was “not an antisemite. She just doesn’t support Zionism.”

That would be the same Owens who called Judaism a “pedophile-centric religion”; argued that Jews believed in incest and child rape “as sacramental rites”; urged her listeners to read a text by the German antisemite August Rohling accusing Jews of drinking Christian blood; called Judaism “the synagogue of Satan”; and claimed that Jews were behind every great evil, from the slave trade to the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

Then there is Tucker Carlson, who flew to Ben Gurion Airport to interview U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee. Here is what happened there.

Carlson had barely wrapped the interview before the two were already disagreeing on a basic fact.

Carlson, the influential conservative commentator, flew to Tel Aviv to conduct the interview at Ben Gurion Airport, departing hours later without leaving the airport. Before leaving, he told the British tabloid Daily Mail that Israeli authorities confiscated his passport, dragged his executive producer into an interrogation room, “and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about.”

Not so, says the ambassador. What Carlson’s team experienced was simply a routine security measure.

“Everyone who comes in or out of Israel (every country for that matter) has passports checked and is routinely asked security questions,” Huckabee wrote on X, refuting his former Fox News colleague before their conversation could go live.

So here you have three influential conservatives whose goal appears to be to disabuse fellow conservatives of their support for Israel - based, at least in part, on their Catholic beliefs.

Adding fuel to the fire the following as Leibovitz notes:

…above all this, the actions and words of America’s most prominent Catholic today have become so important—and so troubling. One morally clear statement could disempower this entire emerging false idol. Instead, he seems to be doing the opposite.

I am not so quick to condemn Vice President JD Vance as an antisemite, closet or otherwise. He has, in fact, condemned antisemitism on more than one occasion. But at the same time, he risks undermining the very movement he so strongly believes in - the conservative movement that gave him the opportunity to be where he is now.

As a recently converted Catholic, his religion formally rejects the kind of antisemitism being spread by his friend. Doesn’t he realize how much damage this does to the party? Does he really believe there is room for this kind of antisemitism in it? Does he think the vast majority of evangelical Christians - who view Israel as a strong ally and the Jewish people as worthy of blessing - will tolerate the kind of rhetoric being promoted?

And where are his own ethics here...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

The IDF and Women in Combat

I have never been a fan of women in the military with respect to joining men in any kind of combat role in the military. Not because I don’t think they can do the job. Although I do question the notion that women generally have the same upper-body strength as men. They do not. Which can place them at a disadvantage. I am, however, sure that many women can do the job well enough to qualify. Especially if the standards for qualifying have been lowered to accommodate those differences. (Which is, after all, what equity is about - but I digress.)

My objection is based on the nature of human sexuality. To deny that there is physical attraction between the sexes is to deny nature. Placing men and women together under intimate circumstances is, in my view, an invitation to sexual activity—some of it consensual and some of it not. The latter of which is one reason I am opposed to integrating women with men even in the U.S. Army. It isn’t rocket science to understand why there has been an increase in sexual harassment and abuse in the military since women were integrated into it.

To argue that men ought to better control themselves, or that the military ought to have stricter policies about sexual abuse, does not negate the argument that there would likely be far less abuse if men and women were not integrated in the first place. A policy driven, in part, by the equity demands of modern-day feminism. But again - I digress.

If one is a religious Jew, one must avoid - NOT only situations of harassment and abuse, but even situations of consensual intimacy outside of marriage. Sexual intimacy outside of marriage is forbidden by Jewish law and, in certain cases, constitutes an Issur Kareis - a very severe biblical penalty that includes premature death at the hands of Heaven. (Why that is the case is beyond the scope of this post.)

In Israel, this issue affects many religious IDF soldiers. The close contact between men and women - combined with the nature of human sexual attraction, especially at the young age at which most IDF soldiers serve creates a serious risk of violating Halacha.

True, every Jew must exercise willpower to avoid temptation in matters that violate Halacha. But to be deliberately placed in an environment that may require extraordinary restraint to resist what is natural is asking a lot. The temptation to succumb to nature can be overwhelming and could easily overpower the inclination to resist.

The obvious solution, from my perspective, is not to place men and women together in the first place.

But Israel’s left wing -  eager to present the country as the most enlightened  and progressive in the world - has elevated feminism to the highest of pedestals. That means men and women must serve together in all areas of the military. Any limitation, it is argued, would be sexist because it would deny women opportunities that men automatically get.

What about honoring Halacha...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

Dogs, Muslims, and Randy Fine

Florida Representative, Randy Fine (JTA)

We need all the pro-Israel members of Congress we can get. There are far too many who are openly hostile to Israel and many more whose support is tepid. Most (though not all) Democrats. 

Sadly, some of those Democrats are Jewish - at least by birth, if not in practice. There are also reliable anti-Israel Republicans. Among them Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. Thankfully, neither is running for reelection.

And then there is Florida Representative Randy Fine. He is probably one of the most pro-Israel Republicans in the House. Unfortunately, he seems to be increasingly becoming the “Ben-Gvir” of the House.

I am loath to criticize someone whose support for the Jewish state is as strong as Randy Fine’s. But it may well be that the price of that support is too high. For example, what he tweeted last Sunday, as reported by JTA:

“If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one.”

The comment implied that he would choose dogs over Muslims if forced to decide who should be allowed into this country. His explanation - that he was responding to a tweet from the leader of a radical pro-Palestinian activist group - doesn’t help much. The comment was wrong. It was anti-Muslim and hurtful. Not all Muslims that come to America are terrorists. Many are decent people who simply want to live their lives in peace and pursue the American dream.

It didn’t take long for even moderate pro-Israel Democrats in Congress to condemn him in harsh terms. For example:

The Jewish Democratic Council of America called Fine’s remarks “a disgrace to Congress, an affront to everything America stands for, and antithetical to Jewish values,” and urged Congress to censure him. Democratic Majority for Israel, which works to strengthen support for Israel among Democrats, called the remarks “vile and indefensible.”

Moderate Jewish Democrats, including Senator Jacky Rosen and Representative Dan Goldman, also blasted Fine for his comments.“

This disgusting and dehumanizing rhetoric is unbecoming of any American—especially a Member of Congress,” Rosen tweeted.

There was much more from Democrats in that vein.

I actually agree with them... 

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

A Perfect Storm

An overturned police car in Bnei Brak (TVJ)

Yes, they are exceptions. Most of the Charedi world is nothing like them. But there are in fact a lot of exceptions. And they populate a variety of neighborhoods in Israel. From Bnei Brak, to Meah Shearim, to Ramat Beit Shemesh. All of which have had similar incidents. Many of them. They all have one thing in common with the Charedi rioters who attacked two female IDF soldiers in Bnei Brak. They are bottom feeders -  the absolute scum of the earth. There is no other way to describe them.

What they did has been widely reported, far beyond the Jewish media. Here is one brief excerpt describing what happened:

Two young Israel Defense Forces soldiers visited a private home. What began as a routine visit spiraled into a violent confrontation between extremist rioters and the police. The two servicewomen were chased through the streets by hundreds of men. Footage circulating on social media shows them running through narrow streets under police escort, pursued by a swelling mob…

The atmosphere quickly devolved from verbal hostility into outright violence. Rioters overturned trash bins, set fire to a police motorcycle, and even toppled a police vehicle. One officer was reportedly wounded. The sense of lawlessness that enveloped the neighborhood recalled earlier flashpoints of unrest that have periodically flared in ultra-Orthodox enclaves during moments of acute tension with state authorities.

For what it’s worth, these reprobates were universally condemned by all factions of the Israeli government, including the Charedi parties.

Condemnation is a good start. But it is far from enough.

One has to examine the underlying causes of such behavior...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

An Appalling Op-ed by a Charedi MK

MK Rabbi Yitzchak Pindrus (Ynet)

I can’t help it. I should be used to the myopic, self-centered attitude of Charedi leadership and their Askanim (Charedi Knesset members). But I’m not. Whenever I read an op-ed by one of them on the subject of drafting Charedim into the IDF or their insistence on no secular education, I nearly recoil with disgust. It happened again over Shabbos as I read a guest op-ed in Mishpacha by UTJ’s Rabbi Yitzchak Pindrus.

The scary thing is that he probably believes every word he says. In this case, that amounts to a conspiracy theory: a coalition of Israeli institutions whose goal is to destroy the Torah world. Only now, with unprecedented zeal and determination. As though the State of Israel is more anti-Torah than at any other time in its history.

When in fact, it is more than obvious that the opposite is true. There is more Torah study now in Israel than at any other time in Jewish history!

Some excerpts from the op-ed:

It is no secret that the chareidi community in Eretz Yisrael is facing one of the most severe challenges it has known since the founding of the state. Incitement and polarization have become routine, economic measures are increasingly wielded as political weapons, and pressure on those devoted to Torah study is no longer applied indirectly: It is systematic.

In the Knesset, we work toward one clear objective, guided by the gedolei Yisrael in this struggle for the soul of the state: securing the status of Torah scholars, who have served as the spiritual shield of the Jewish People in every generation.

This is no longer a technical debate over enlistment targets or budgetary clauses. It is a struggle over legitimacy itself: the legitimacy of a Torah-observant community to exist in Eretz Yisrael on its own terms… What we are witnessing is not spontaneous hostility, but a calculated and well-orchestrated campaign… a coordinated mechanism that operates as a strategic pipeline: manipulated data is produced, amplified, legitimized, and ultimately translated into policy. Each stage reinforces the next, creating a closed loop that tightens pressure around the chareidi home under the cover of professionalism and objectivity.

Rabbi Pindrus goes on to describe in detail why he believes this to be the case. I’m sure he sees it exactly as he tells it. And suggests that more must be done to counter this alleged campaign.

He may not intend violence to be part of that mission, but the urgency with which he frames his argument could easily be interpreted that way. After all, when fighting for one’s very existence, one must do whatever it takes to survive.

What is beyond belief is that he does not seem to care why the rest of Israel is so upset - even angry - at the Charedi world. He has to know about the sacrifices being made by the rest of the Israeli population. It isn’t a secret. How is it possible that he sees only enemies and not the blood, sweat, and tears so many of his own people have endured? Some of whom are just as devout as he is! How is it possible that he does not have the kind of deep compassion shown by Rav Asher Weiss when he visited a hospitalized IDF soldier who had lost two legs and an arm in battle?

Nothing. Not a word. It’s all about the ‘war against the Torah’.

The key to his willful blindness is actually mentioned in the body of his message: ‘guided by the gedolei Yisrael’.

The only possible explanation for his inability to see beyond his community’s narrow interests is his leadership’s refusal to speak about anything else. They sees what is happening as an existential threat. Not only to themselves, but to the soul of Israel. If Charedim don’t get their way, Israel will lose its soul. The corollary is that it will no longer be a Jewish state and perhaps no longer deserve to survive.

The kind of high-level Torah study done in Charedi Yeshivos and Kollels is therefore portrayed as necessary for Israel’s very existence. A level of Torah study not done anywhere else.

This ignores the many Religious Zionist Yeshivos where high-level Torah study also takes place - fully supported by the supposedly ‘anti-Torah’ government.

For the sake of argument, let us concede that the Charedi Yeshiva world does contain Torah study at levels that surpass even the best of the Religious Zionist Yeshivos...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

Playing the Holocaust Card

US Rep. Becca Balint questioning AG Pam Bondi at the Epstein hearing (TOI)

The world is on fire, and we are still talking about Jeffrey Epstein. A nation whose sworn allegiance is to a militant version of Islam that seeks to impose Sharia law over all the nations of the world. A nation that was on the verge of becoming a nuclear power - and still determined to become one. A nation that had exported terror across the region to Islamist proxies surrounding Israel whose aim its destruction and the annihilation of the nearly seven million Jews that inhabit it.

The US military is currently poised to attack her if negotiations don’t work out. And yet certain politicians, pursuing their own agenda, want to know who Epstein had dinner with on a particular evening.

Their objective appears to be casting the president as some sort of co-conspirator sex trafficker with Epstein. They are convinced he was and will not give up until they find something. They don’t seem to care who gets hurt in the process. If a record shows that someone once had a conversation with Epstein, that ‘someone’ may as well hide under a rock for the rest of his life. He will be tainted forever, even if he did nothing wrong. How many more people will become collateral damage in the pursuit of presidential ‘dirt’?

This has nothing to do with the compassion we must all feel for all of Epstei many victims. They deserve justice. The question is: what does justice look like? I’m not sure that the objective of finding ‘dirt’ on the president is the kind of justice they are seeking, righteous indignation from those members of Congress notwithstanding.

That brings me to a shouting match between Vermont Representative Becca Balint and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on this subject a few days ago.

Representative Balint, a progressive Democrat, did her ‘due diligence’ in seeking dirt on the president by asking the attorney general whether the president had been aware of Howard Lutnick’s ties to Epstein when he was appointed commerce secretary. 

Did Epstein’s victims really believe justice would be served for them if Bondi answered that question? I doubt that the president’s knowledge of such matters had any impact on the justice they seek. Except perhaps for those equally antagonistic toward the president for political reasons.

Instead of answering what she viewed as a loaded question, Bondi changed the subject and accused Balint of being soft on antisemitism, saying…

“With this antisemitic culture right now, she voted against a resolution condemning ‘from the river to the sea,’” apparently referring to Balint’s April 2024 vote against a House resolution condemning the common pro-Palestinian slogan.

At that point, Balint played the ‘Holocaust card’ and angrily responded…

“Oh, do you want to go there, Attorney General? Do you want to go there? Are you serious? Talking about antisemitism to a woman who lost her grandfather in the Holocaust? Really? Really?”

Balint then stormed out of the room.

Nice theatrics. But it doesn’t fly with me.

My grandparents were killed in the Holocaust, too...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

If They Build It, Charedim Will Come

Charedim in the Chashmonaim brigade ( TOI - Chaim Goldberg)

In yet another unsurprising development in the ongoing ‘war’  between Charedi leaders and just about everyone else in Israel, Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch has withdrawn his support for a Knesset bill that would have enabled (with their approval) the IDF to draft Charedim who were not studying Torah full-time.

As has been widely reported, that support was not sincere in any case. A recording of a private conversation revealed Rav Hirsch admitting that the bill was a sham and that not a single Charedi would end up serving.

That had drawn the ire of respected talmidei chachamim in the Religious Zionist camp, such as Rav David Stav. Religious Zionists serve with distinction and honor, risking life and limb in the process. Unlike Charedim, they see military service as a requirement of Torah law.

Now it appears that Charedi leaders will not even support the bill they would not have honored in the first place.

What is most galling about their rhetoric is how they describe their opponents. Mincing no words in portraying them as evil. Do they actually believe what they say? The following excerpt from a message delivered in Hebrew by Rav Dov Landau (which is typical of their attitude) stood out:

“To those evildoers and schemers of wickedness who seek to break our spirit and steal the treasure of our world, we say clearly: do not delude yourselves that you will succeed.

Unlike you, we are people of noble spirit. Our hands do no evil, and we have no desire to use the tools of your malice. Yet know this: your opposition to lomdei haTorah is a war against the eternal Klal Yisrael.

History is full of those who sought to remove Torah from Yisrael. They perished, their names forgotten, their power vanished like a fleeting shadow. But the Torah endures forever.”

It may be the case that some of their opponents fit that description. But they cannot possibly say that about their Religious Zionist opponents. No distinction is made. To imply that Rav Stav and his Religious Zionist colleagues are “evildoers and schemers of wickedness” is, in and of itself, terribly wrong.

Rav Landau has every right to disagree. But to issue such a blanket condemnation is something I cannot believe a religious leader in Klal Yisrael would say - knowing full well that Religious Zionist leaders support drafting Charedim. Surely Rav Landau knows there are devout Jews serving in the IDF - some of whom are even Charedi. How can he speak this way?

As I have said many times, the power behind the ‘throne’ of Charedi leadership is Daas Torah...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free.

Extremist Modesty as the New Normal

MBD concert in Jerusalem (2023)

I wonder what my younger self would think - if suddenly transported to the world in which we live today.

My parents were religious Jews who grew up in pre-Holocaust Europe. The religious values they absorbed stayed with them for life. I was raised according to those standards in post-Holocaust America. Although the world of European Jewry and American Jewry could not have been further apart culturally, the primary tenets of observant Judaism did not diminish in the slightest. Shabbos, kashrus, family purity laws (mikvah) were strictly observed, and Torah study was considered paramount.

But for my parents, living in the New World meant adapting to those parts of the culture that did not contradict halacha in particular and Torah values in general. So we owned a TV and occasionally went to a movie as a family. In short, we led a pretty normal American Jewish life without abandoning observance or Jewish values in any way.

It wasn’t only my family that lived that way. The acknowledged head of the Orthodox community in the city where we lived – Toledo - was Rabbi Nechemia Katz, who was also Rav Moshe Feinstein’s brother-in-law. He was my father’s posek, deciding difficult questions of Jewish law. Our families were good friends, and we would often go to the beach together. (Yes, you read that correctly.) What may be little known is that Rav Moshe used to visit his brother-in-law in Toledo on occasion. That is how I met Rav Moshe.One year when I came home for Shabbos Chanukah (from Telshe) my father and I walked over to meet him on Friday night.

This, in a nutshell, is what life was like for Orthodox Jews in America back then (early 1960s).

The idea of mixed-gender seating in any arena (other than a shul) was not an issue. It was as normal as apple pie. Men and women were often seated together in various forums, such as concerts or banquets. No one gave it a second thought.

Fast forward to today. The following was published in Arutz Sheva:

A letter published in the sector’s Yated Ne’eman newspaper and signed by all the leading Lithuanian-Charedi Torah scholars announced the establishment of a new rabbinical committee called “Shira Kehalacha” (Song According to Jewish Law). The new committee will oversee the performance industry and act as a kind of “kosher certification” for the music world.

The committee’s directives include a complete ban on mixed-gender performances, even those with full separation. Male singers are prohibited from performing in front of women in any setting. Exceptions will only be made for events within synagogues under strict supervision.

Simultaneously, singers and producers are required to sign a commitment to adhere to these rules. Anyone who refuses will be subject to a ban.

Men singers can no longer perform in front of women?!

Wow!

To answer the opening question: I would think I had suddenly been transported to mars!

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. To receive substack posts - you must subscribe. It's easy and it's free.

An Appalling Indifference to Israeli Suffering

Rav David Stav 

There has been intense anger expressed by many in Israel over a bill now pending in the Knesset that was ostensibly agreed to by both the Netanyahu government and Charedi leadership. The bill would - for the first time - draft Charedim into the IDF.

Under the proposal, Charedim not studying Torah full time in a Yeshiva or Kollel would be subject to the draft, with rabbinic approval. It was widely understood that enough Charedim fall into this category to significantly alleviate the IDF’s manpower shortage, thereby reducing the unbearably long and dangerous tours of duty now imposed on secular and religious-Zionist soldiers—a burden created largely by the blanket exemption of the Charedi community.

Although this would mean that only about 10% of Charedim would actually be drafted, I supported the compromise—not because it was fair, but because it was pragmatic.

 But a truly equitable law would require service from all citizens, exempting only the most elite Torahscholars. (What percentage that would be and how that would be measured is beyond the scope of this post.) But that was never politically realistic. This bill at least appeared to solve the manpower crisis.

It now seems that even this modest reform is illusory. One of the Charedi leaders who approved the deal has openly stated that the law is merely a ‘show’. And that no Charedi will ever be forced to serve if he does not wish to.

Prime Minister Netanyahu insists otherwise, but his motives are transparent. He needs the Charedi parties to remain in the coalition. If they leave, his government falls. The bill is therefore being sold as a victory for the IDF, even as evidence mounts that little will change.

The result is the perpetuation of a devastating status quo: endless reserve duty rotations that – except for Charedim - will endanger lives, destroy livelihoods, fracture families, and leave untold numbers of soldiers struggling with PTSD—sometimes so severe that they are unable to work or function normally. The human cost cannot be overstated.

It is appalling to me that the Charedi leadership never addresses this. At least not publicly. How can they ignore the ongoing tragedy affecting so many people who are sacrificing so much for their people?

Charedi leaders justify their opposition by claiming that army service leads to irreligiosity, asserting that the IDF is fundamentally a secularizing institution designed to strip religious Jews of observance. Anecdotal claims - such as one repeated by Rav Aharon Feldman, that ‘about half’ of Charedim who enlist become irreligious—are treated as proof...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. But it's easy and it's free.

Progressive Jews

Mamdani's interfaith breakfast (JTA)

A headline that caught my eye this morning reads as follows:

“With Mamdani, progressive Jews are now agreeing instead of protesting at mayor’s interfaith breakfast.”

That led me to ask the obvious question: Is it possible to be both progressive and authentically Jewish at the same time?

For me, the answer is clear. Progressive values, as defined by self-described ‘progressive Jews,’ are decisively not Jewish values. This is not to say that none of those values contain any Jewish elements at all. It is to say that the overall philosophy of progressivism has little, if anything, to do with the values of the Torah. No matter how much the progressive heterodox rabbis who inhabit that world insist that they do.

The Torah sets forth some very strict parameters defining who we are, how we should act, and what kinds of behavior we must reject. Parameters outlined in the Torah itself and interpreted by the sages of every generation.

That progressive Jews support the Mamdani agenda says far more about their progressive values than it does about their religious values.

That said, it isn’t entirely their fault. Most of these progressive Jews had little or no Jewish education to speak of. They know little, if anything, about their Jewish heritage or the values of authentic Judaism. What they do know, they tend to dismiss as archaic and irrelevant to their lived values of universalism. The idea of Jewish exceptionalism is not only foreign to them - it is considered evil and self-centered.

Progressive values insist on the absolute equality of man. Differences are ignored. Differences in lifestyle – no matter how aberrant - are celebrated as morally positive. To a progressive, sexual orientation is in no way a factor in God’s eyes. One’s choice of same sex sexual intimacy is viewed as just that—a choice with no inherent moral content.

This is the ‘Judaism’ of the progressive. This is how they define it. Which is why Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, rabbi emerita of the LGBTQ+ synagogue Congregation Beit Simchat Torah, was so happy to attend the mayor’s interfaith breakfast. There is nothing for her to disagree with him about.

What does she consider a Jewish value...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. To receive substack posts - you must subscribe. It's easy and it's free.