Banned by the Agudah Moetzes |
The invitation was extended by Abby Pogrebin, a non Orthodox
Jewish reporter who decided to be observant of all Jewish holidays and fasts for a period of a
year. She has learned a lot about those holidays... and now for example understands
that Chanukah is about not giving in to assimilation. It is about daring to be
different than a surrounding culture beckoning you to be a part of it. Chanukah
is anything but about the ‘spirit of the season’. It is about being separate from that spirit.
Rabbi Shafran expressed his warm feelings for Ms. Pogrebin
and said some very nice things about her as a Jew.
While I agree that Rabbi Shafran made the right decision, this
is one of those areas about which I truly have mixed feelings. Engaging with
heterodox rabbis on matters of theology does indeed place a mantel of
legitimacy upon them. This was a matter upon which Gedolei HaDor of the
previous generation agreed - including Rav Soloveitchik.
On matters pertaining to theology, I don't think there is
any room for debate. But in other matters that affect Jews on a national, non
theological level (like support for Israel or in other matters that effect the
Jewish people sociologically) I agree with Rav Soloveitchik who said we may
join with them.
My problem hearkens back to what happened several years ago
when Orthodox Rabbi Yosef Reinman and Reform Rabbi Amiel Hirsch wrote a
book about their friendship and their religious differences - and then together
embarked on a book tour. The Agudah Moetzes reprimanded Rabbi Reinman and told he must stop since it violated the principles laid down by
previous Gedolim. Principles that forbade any interaction at all with heterodox
rabbis saying that joining them at any level grants them legitimacy and is therefore forbidden.
Rabbi Reinman, a Charedi adherent of Daas Torah expressed
through the Agudah Moetzes acceded to their demands and withdrew, but not
without expressing some regret since he found himself getting through to masses
of Jews he would otherwise never have come into contact with.
I am aware of the pitfalls of starting down that slippery
slope. Open Orthodoxy has gone down that road with the best of intentions and that
and has resulted in crossing the hard and fast line drawn by their spiritual
mentor, Rav Soloveitchk. This is why my feelings are mixed. There is always the
fear of starting down a road that can lead to the perception that legitimizes the illegitimate.
However, in the current climate where heterodox movements
are dying, what better time than now is there to reach out to them in any way
we can? Giving legitimacy is still wrong... but the line where that is crossed
should certainly be moved a bit to allow the kind of opportunity created by
Rabbi Reinman to not be missed.
Projects like Rabbi Reniman's book and tour have tremendous
Kiruv potential with little downside WRT giving them any legitimacy. Especially
when distinctions and disclaimers are made as was the case with Rabbi Reinman at
the one appearance he made (and I assume he would have continued to
make).
I wrote about this at the time. And I feel even stronger
about it now. Isn't the time more than ripe to For members of the Moetzes to ‘move
the goal posts’ – and take advantage of this situation?