 |
| Rabbi Aaron D. Twerski |
I am a fan. I am full of admiration - not only of
Rabbi Aaron D. Twerski, but of his entire extended family. (At least the
ones I know about.) I don’t think it would
be lying to say that my own education in both religious and secular studies pales
in comparison to his.
Rabbi Twerski is a devout Chasid that descends from a long line of Chasidic
Rebbes. He is also a professor of law at Brooklyn Law School and former Dean of Hofstra University Law School. Unfortunately he is not typical of the
community from which he stems. The more extreme of which (e.g. Satmar) eschews the kind of secular education
Rabbi Twerski both received and teaches.
I mention this in light of an article he published
in Crain’s New York Business. Therein he defends the current paradigm of Yeshivos now being attacked for lack of providing any secular
education to their students.
This subject is not new to me. It is one that is
dear to my heart. It is a subject that cause tremendous grief. Not because the
system is being attacked. But because of what the attack is all about. Which is
the above-mentioned lack of a secular education for their children. Who - except
for the truly gifted among them that can catch up - grow up lacking the tools needed
to get the very education Rabbi Twerski himself received. Added to this is the generally very negative
attitude among Chasidim about attending college altogether – in most cases.
Rabbi Twerski describes the financial successes of
a variety of Chasidim in various fields. Chasidic entrepreneurs like the owner of
B&H Electronics. He is a Satmar
Chasid that accomplished all of this without any secular education. His success
and that of other Chasdic businessmen like him is attributed to the critical thinking
skills one learns through the rigors of Torah study at intense and high levels.
Rabbi Twerski asserts that this shows very clearly that their education is
sufficient as is. And that success in the business world need not include any of
the skills one develops in studying secular subjects.
I fully agree that many skills are learned that
way. But there are skills that are left out that only the type of study one
finds only on the secular side of one’s education.
Rabbi Twerski cites some examples of Chasidim that
are accountants which clearly requires the kind of secular knowledge attained at
a university. Passing a CPA exam is not easy even for one who has done that. My
point being that those among Chasidim that pass a CPA exam are either
exceptionally brilliant; have attended those college courses surreptitiously;
or are not members of the more extreme anti college Chasidic sects like Satmar –
one of the largest groups of Chasidim in the world.
It is true that many Chasidim without a secular
education have jobs with decent salaries. It is for example a tribute to the owners
of B& H that hire many Chasidim (and other Jews, religious or not; as well as non Jews of all stripes and colors)
at decent salaries. Rabbi Twerski may also be right about hiring prejudices against
Chasidim by certain employers. This, he says, is part of the reason there is so
much poverty among them. As is their typically large families where a combined
income (husband and wife) can often reach six figures still not be enough to make ends meet.
Rabbi Twerski therefore rejects what he says is
the charge that the root cause of their poverty is too much emphasis on
religious studies in their schools.
It isn’t that there is too much emphasis on
religious studies. It is that there is hardly any emphasis at all on secular studies.
This is what the charge is all about - and I agree.
It is true that there are a lot of things about the
religious side of a Yeshiva education that are valuable not only to the
spiritual welfare of a Jew but even to their material welfare – as Rabbi Twerski
points out. But I could not disagree more with his assertion that the current structure
of Yeshivas in the more extreme segments of the Chasidic world is as sufficient preparation for the work force than it would be if they restructured their
curriculum to include a good secular studies program. Which at the very least
should be more or less what the city (or state) of New York requires.
This is what YAFFED (Young Advoctaes for Fair Education) seeks. They have gone to great
lengths to see that New York’s core curriculum mandate is adhered to. As of
yet, I don’t think this has happened.
I am not a mind reader and can’t speak to the
actual motives of this group. They have been accused of having an ulterior
motive to destroy Yeshivos rather than their stated goal of giving Chasidim
a better secular education. The fact that YAFFED’s founder is a lapsed Chasid (and
possibly no longer observant) has led many rabbis and other observant Jewish
leaders to make that charge.
True or not - that does not detract from their
stated goal which I support. It is a goal worthy of the support of all of us
regardless of our religious orientation. These Chasidim are our brothers. They
deserve to be given every chance to succeed in life, Both spiritually and
materially. So that even if Rabbi Twerski’s praise to this community for their material
success is accurate, why not enhance the opportunity for more of them so that they too can do
better materially?
For me that means adding a secular studies program
to their curriculum. Much the same way most non Chasidic yeshivas do by offering
both a religious studies program along side a secular studies program. It may not
solve all their problems. But is surely will not hurt.
