Dr. Saundra Epstein, director of the Welcoming Shuls Project. (NJJN) |
Update
My apologies to Rabbi Geretz for misleading readers about his actual view with respect to Miskhav Zechor. The implication in the post as originally written was that he permitted it. I have had communications with him about this. He is clear about it being completely forbidden. I am truly sorry for this error and any anguish I caused him. The post has been corrected to eliminate any such implication. - HM
Rabbi Daniel Geretz is one of a handful of YCT (Yeshivat ChoveveiTorah) ordainees whose compassion for every human being has translated into questionable religious tactics. I have had a few e-mail exchanges with him and am 100% convinced of his sincere intentions and the belief that such tactics are in line with the will of God. This seems to be a common characteristic of YCT graduates. They place human dignity on a very high level. Which is indeed the will of God.
My apologies to Rabbi Geretz for misleading readers about his actual view with respect to Miskhav Zechor. The implication in the post as originally written was that he permitted it. I have had communications with him about this. He is clear about it being completely forbidden. I am truly sorry for this error and any anguish I caused him. The post has been corrected to eliminate any such implication. - HM
Rabbi Daniel Geretz is one of a handful of YCT (Yeshivat ChoveveiTorah) ordainees whose compassion for every human being has translated into questionable religious tactics. I have had a few e-mail exchanges with him and am 100% convinced of his sincere intentions and the belief that such tactics are in line with the will of God. This seems to be a common characteristic of YCT graduates. They place human dignity on a very high level. Which is indeed the will of God.
But there are instances where specific attempts at
human dignity are clearly not in that spirit. How, one may ask, is that possible
that treating a fellow human being with dignity is not in the spirit of what we know of God’s will? The answer is when God clearly expresses that the common behavior of an
individual violates His word.
Honoring a loving relationship where that love
is often expressed by behavior that is clearly forbidden by God as recorded in the bible is an obvious
case like that. Rabbi Geretz’s misplaced compassion appears to override that. An article in
the New Jersey Jewish News quotes him saying the following:
“I can’t wrap my head around a refusal to wish a mazal tov to a gay or lesbian couple following a same-sex commitment ceremony.” He feels saddened when Jews who self-identify as Orthodox can’t find an Orthodox synagogue where they feel comfortable.
Compassion does not mean celebrating a
forbidden relationship. But that is
precisely what the LGBT community is asking for. And Rabbi Geretz in a sincere attempt
to show human dignity to a homosexual couple by celebrating their union is clearly
wrong.
This of course does not mean we ostracize gay or
transgender people. But neither does it mean we celebrate a situation that invites
opportunities to commit serious violation of Halacha. If you are a Jew, believe in God, and that His will is recorded in the Torah - you cannot have it both
ways. There has to be a limit to what can and cannot be celebrated in a Torah
oriented community. If a union between 2 people is forbidden it is the height of
absurdity to publicly congratulate people who are involved in it.
Rabbi Geretz is not the first or only one to do this. It was done not long ago in the Shul of YCT founder Rabbi Avi Weiss. In a published announcement they celebrated the engagement of a homosexual couple right along with the engagement of heterosexual couples. (They have since removed that announcement and
promised not to do it again after being admonished by the OU).
Rabbi Geretz remains undeterred. As does all the
of the other synagogues that are participating in a new LGBT initiative for its
Orthodox members. It’s called The Welcoming Shuls Project (WSP). This is a program that seeks gay friendly Shuls
that are welcoming to gay people and their families.
According to the article there are 103 Orthodox Shuls
across the country that have signed on to the program. However, it appears that most of them do so surreptitiously - fearing
repercussion from mainstream Orthodox institutions such as the OU.
I believe they are right to fear
repercussions. Because it is obvious from this article that WSP is more than
about welcoming gay people into their shuls. It is about celebrating them.
I have said many times in the past that we are
obligated to treat every human being with dignity, regardless of who they are
attracted to. If an individual has a same sex attraction, it is their business.
As long as people don’t make their sexuality a public issue, they ought to be welcomed unto a Shul. But if they do make it public - that ought not be celebrated.
Because celebrating it
is in essence celebrating a sinful relationship. I think that is the goal of programs like
WSP mirrors the goal of the
LGBT community. They do not seek only compassion and understanding. They do not
only acceptance. They seek to normalize forbidden homosexual sex making it equivalent to permitted heterosexual
sex. In a world that does not place much value on biblical teachings, that
makes sense. Why, after all, would anyone see a problem in any kind of consensual
sex between 2 consenting adults?
If, however, one does value biblical teachings as
God’s will - then one has to consider that to be the primary consideration, regardless of the
compassion and understanding one might feel about it otherwise.
This is where many well intended left wing rabbis fail. Their compassion is so overwhelming that they are nearly blinded to biblical injunction. When confronted with it some have tried to interpret that injunction out of existence with extreme rationalizations
about what the Torah actually means – turning that injunction on its head and - in practical
terms - permitting the forbidden. All in
the name of a misplaced expression of human dignity.
I therefore continue to protest this new push
to celebrate gay unions. Even as I understand the good intentions behind it.