 |
| Headquarters of the Israeli Chief Rabbinate (VIN) |
The current controversy in Israel is over the acceptance of
converts outside of Israel. The Chief Rabbinate has recently declared that it
will no longer automatically recognize all rabbis in the Diaspora attesting
the legitimacy of a convert. From VIN:
The Chief Rabbinate does not consider non-Orthodox Judaism to be valid, so it does not accept the authority of Conservative and Reform rabbis. And in recent years, it has had a series of public disputes with Orthodox rabbis whose authority it rejects.
This week, hoping to clarify exactly which Orthodox rabbis meet its standards, the Chief Rabbinate published a list of draft criteria for religious courts in the Diaspora. If a religious court meets the criteria, the Jewish conversions it conducts will be recognized by the Chief Rabbinate. If not, the Chief Rabbinate will not consider its converts Jewish.
The same goes for Jewish ritual divorces: The Chief Rabbinate will accept them only if they are performed by a qualified religious court...
The document’s language is in the past tense, which means it could apply retroactively — rejecting the status of Jewish converts who formerly were accepted in Israel. In other words, a convert accepted by the Chief Rabbinate this year could be rejected next year.
The criteria demand that the courts be permanent and operate year-round. Their rabbis must demonstrate fealty to Orthodox Jewish law and be endorsed by a major Orthodox organization.
This has obviously upset a lot of people. Especially those
that feel the Chief Rabbinate’s conversions standards are much stricter than
they have to be. An Orthodox rabbinate ejecting Reform and Conservative conversions should not surprise anyone. But it also means that conversions by Orthodox rabbis who have challenged
the status quo with controversial innovations widely rejected by Mainstream
Orthodoxy - will also be rejected. This includes rabbis
ordained by YCT or their founder, Rabbi Avi Weiss. Even if a conversion was
done long before Rabbi Weiss went rogue.
Critics like Rabbi Seth Farber of Itim (a group that works
to challenge and navigate the Chief Rabbinate’s bureaucracy) have strongly
objected to this kind of thing calling it a power grab by the Chief Rabbinate.
Although it might look like that to the casual observer, I am not so quick to
agree with him.
The fact is that there was a tremendous amount of abuse in
the past. Many people were ‘converted’ by some even Orthodox rabbis that were never really
sincere in their promises to be observant. Whether full observance is even necessary
is a debate that has been settled in recent years despite the protestations of
those who believe we may rely on a lenient Psak (Halachic ruling ) of the past. That
Psak is not accepted today by any recognized Orthodox Posek or institution.
I understand Rabbi Farber’s objection and even sympathize
with him. He is a compassionate individual that cares about the Jewish people
and has tried to do something about what he sees as an intolerable situation. I
can only imagine the grief an individual who believes he has converted being
told that they are not Jewish and must undergo a new conversion.
But that doesn’t change the Halachic requirements for
conversions, which is what the Chief Rabbinate’s guidelines are designed to
enforce.
That said, I do have to take issue with their implied
retroactive rejection. If someone sincere was converted by a rabbi before he
went off the reservation, I don’t think they should be rejected. And if it is
it should be applied evenly to all such rabbis on both the right and the left.
Including Rabbi Leib Tropper, founder of the Eternal Jewish Family (EJF) project, which
advocated more rigorous conversion standards. If anyone went off the reservation he did.
His
position of power in the field enabled him to egregiously sexually abuse at least one of his
female converts. Much the same way Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein’s positions of
power did. Only neither Weinstein nor Cosby were highly respected Orthodox rabbis. If Rabbi
Weiss’s conversions are to be retroactively annulled, all the more so should Rabbi
Tropper’s conversions be retroactively annulled. Which is grossly unfair to the
sincere converts of both rabbis.
In my view anyone converted by a rabbi while he was still accepted,
should be considered completely valid. It is all about Ahavas HaGer. The Torah
tells us we must love our fellow converts and consider them equals. Telling sincere
converts that they are no longer accepted because their converting rabbi is no
longer accepted is simply not right.
