Tuesday, February 24, 2026

A Unifying Proposal

The riots at the Western Wall  - Western Wall Heritage Foundation  (A7)
My views about heterodox movements in Judaism are well known to my readers. I do not believe they are a legitimate representation of Judaism. (Why that is the case is beyond the scope of this post.) I just wanted to make clear where I am coming from on the issue of the egalitarian space at the Kotel.

The truth is that the Kotel did not have separate sections pre-state under the British Mandate. Men and women can be seen praying together in pre-state archival pictures of the Kotel. Men and women do not need a mechitza to pray - even with a minyan - unless they are in a shul.

So why separate them at the Kotel?

First, because one could argue that sections of the Kotel have essentially become shuls, with an Aron Kodesh and a bimah in several places there permanently.

Second, because of the huge crowds that can often congregate there, rabbinic authorities thought it wise to separate the sexes for purposes of simple modesty. That is the status quo, and it has been that way for almost 60 years.

Heterodoxy never requires separation of the sexes during prayer. They allow men and women to pray together in their synagogues and temples. They demanded that their traditions be honored at the Kotel when they pray there. A demand fought vigorously by Orthodoxy.

Long story short, in order to preserve the status quo Orthodox nature of the Kotel, an agreement was reached whereby another section could be used by them for purposes of mixed-gender prayer.

That situation has remained the same and had pretty much kept the peace for a while.

The problem was that it was never developed into a user-friendly area. Ultimately the Reform movement brought the issue before Israel’s Supreme Court. And as JTA reports, the following happened:

Israel’s highest court has delivered a unanimous rebuke to state and municipal authorities over long-stalled plans to upgrade the Western Wall’s egalitarian prayer section, intensifying a dispute that has come to symbolize broader tensions over religious pluralism in Israel.

In a decision issued Thursday, an expanded seven-justice panel of the High Court of Justice ordered the national government and the Jerusalem Municipality to move forward with building permits needed for repairs and infrastructure improvements at the Ezrat Israel prayer platform, the area designated for mixed-gender and non-Orthodox worship south of the main Western Wall plaza.

This ruling brought an angry response from Israel’s Heritage Minister, Rabbi Amichai Eliyahu - a far-right member of Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit party. Eliyahu excoriated the justices who ruled in favor of the Reform movement - and the Reform movement itself - for promoting an egalitarian issue during a time of war, when Jewish soldiers were losing life and limb on the battlefield. Instead of expressing sympathy and support, he accused them of expressing scorn and defaming the IDF, reserving sympathy only for Palestinians in Gaza. And now, to put it the way Eliyahu does, demanding a prize for it at the Western Wall.

To say the least, I am no fan of Eliyahu’s party...

To continue reading this post - and comment on it - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free. 

Disqus