House Speaker John Boehner and Prime Mister Benjamin Netanyahu |
The reason
for all the criticism (aside from assigning narcissistic motives to Netanyahu)
is that by accepting an invitation directly from the Congress, he has snubbed the White House. The
protocol is for foreign leaders to be invited by the
White House. And once here, congress (if they so choose) will then invite them
to address it. This time the White House was by-passed. Congress went directly to Netanyahu and
invited him to come here and address them directly.
The President for his part
has decided to snub Netanyahu back - and will not meet with him. The
reason he gave for that is that it it has always been US policy never to invite
any world leader immediately before their elections - so as not to influence them. Many pundits cite this as yet another incident
bringing relations between the two countries to its lowest point in many years.
Which they say is further evidence of just how much the President and Prime Minister can’t
stand each other. And that the result of all this will negatively affect
Israel.
Well, I’m not buying any of it. I know that most of the above is the conventional wisdom. But there are some very important factors that indicate to me that none of this is really the case.
That the President and the Prime Minister disagree on policy is no secret. Not any more than it is a secret that Netanyahu and his political rivals in Israel disagree. And he has a lot of them there. But the relationship between the 2 countries has never been stronger – despite that disagreement. There is no argument between the President and the Prime Minister on that.
That the President and the Prime Minister disagree on policy is no secret. Not any more than it is a secret that Netanyahu and his political rivals in Israel disagree. And he has a lot of them there. But the relationship between the 2 countries has never been stronger – despite that disagreement. There is no argument between the President and the Prime Minister on that.
The idea
that Israel will suffer consequences because of a speech is laughable. Cooperation between the 2 countries goes both ways. Does anyone seriously believe that Israeli
intelligence is of no value to the US? Does anyone seriously believe that the
US would want to jeopardize the close relationship any more than Israel
would? Furthermore, I happen to believe that the
President means what he says when he says the US has Israel’s back. I
cannot imagine any scenario where the President would back-pedal from that.
Nor
do I really believe that the 2 leaders hate each other all that much. They may
not be the best of friends. But…hate? That’s a pretty strong word and I have
never seen or heard any statement from either of them that even remotely
hints at that. Instead I hear them both say that the relationship between the two counties are
as strong as ever. Stressing that disagreement between 2 allies is quite normal. All this talk about hate comes from
other - usually ‘unnamed sources’. And they are immediately denied by the President
The haters might just be people with their own agenda. Not the President himself. But even if they do hate each other. That has been the case from almost the beginning
of the Obama Presidency. And yet the relationship since then has only improved.
What is lost in all of this is the real reason he was
invited. It wasn’t just a ploy of Israel’s ambassador to the US, Ron Dormer.
Although he may have set this whole thing in motion, John Boehner is not an
idiot. You don’t become the Speaker of the House by being an idiot. He knew
there would be criticism but invited Netanyahu anyway. He too disagrees with the
President’s appeasement policy with respect to a Nuclear capable Iran. As the
so-called negotiations continue, Iran’s enrichment program goes on full speed
ahead. Since the talks began they have substantially increased the enrichment of fissile material. Rome is burning while US negotiators are
fiddling.
Now I am not saying I know what to do about that. But it is
clear to me that what we are doing now isn’t working. And members of the
President’s own party have expressed the same doubts.
In light of all the terrorism in the world right now, Why wouldn’t congress want to hear what one of the world’s
foremost experts on terror has to say about it? And why wouldn’t the Prime
Minister of Israel want to do whatever he can to protect his country from a
nuclear Iran? If speaking to congress can change a few more Democrat hearts and minds, I think he should go for it. Netanyahu may be a politician interested in
getting elected. But which politician isn’t? So let the critics on both sides of the
Atlantic squawk. This too shall pass.
If this helps Netanyahu win with a
stronger government, I’m all for it. Although there was some speculation
that Netanyahu might succumb to all this pressure to withdraw from speaking to congress,
it seems he will not succumb it - and will speak. And the US Israeli relationship
will remain as strong as ever - with the same bi-partisan support it
has now.
Postscript:
The reason these 3 Senators say they will not attend? They say it is because this speech undermines the bi-partisanship support of Israel. What fools. It is they who are undermining it by boycotting the speech. If there were 100% attendance it will show bi-partisan support. if they want to support Israel they ought to show up.
Postscript:
So far 3 senators have said they will not attend the joint session of congress that PM Netanyahu will address. 2 of them are Jewish. And one of those Bernie Sanders who is neither a Democrat or Republican - and pretty much a Socialist. The 3rd is Patrick Leahy whose claim to fame was being caught leaking sensitive information to the press when doing so benefited him or hampered his political opponents. And he's the one who is accusing Boehner of partisanship? This foolish politcal politcal ploy cost his to resign form the Senate Intelligence Committee He was vice chairman at the time. (I can't believe Leahy was re-elected after that!)
The reason these 3 Senators say they will not attend? They say it is because this speech undermines the bi-partisanship support of Israel. What fools. It is they who are undermining it by boycotting the speech. If there were 100% attendance it will show bi-partisan support. if they want to support Israel they ought to show up.