 |
| Professor Marc B. Shapiro |
The phenomenon of putting ideals ahead of the truth is not a
new one. It was articulated by Rav Shimon Schwab; accepted and perpetuated by
Rabbi Nosson Scherman, publisher of Mesorah Publications (ArtScroll). Here is what
R’ Schwab said - as quoted by Ezra Glinter in a Forward review of Professor Marc Shapiro's new book, Changing the Immutable: How Orthodox Judaism Rewrites Its History :
Shimon Schwab, a prominent 20th-century German Jewish rabbi who argued that “a realistic historic picture” is good for “nothing but the satisfaction of curiosity.” Rather, he claimed, “every generation has to put a veil over the human failings of its elders and glorify all the rest which is great and beautiful.” If that means doing without factually accurate knowledge, he continued, “We can do without.”
Rabbi Scherman put it this way. His biographical books are designed to
inspire. If a negative fact of history is included in the biography of a
religious Jewish hero, it will uninspire. That fact trumps the truth.
To the extent that it has ever been tried, even by Charedi
authors like Rav Nosson Kamenetsky, it has been rejected. Even if I would agree with Rabbi Scherman
(which I don’t) - what a specific Hashkafa deems negative might be seen as
positive to those of us with a different Hashkafa.
For example that Rav Aharon
Kotler once read secular literature or wrote letters to his fiancé before they were married is deemed derogatory by the Hashkafa of the right. How dare we say
that a pure and holy man like R’ Aharon Kotler read secular books… or even worse, wrote letters to his finance?! To the Charedi mindset these things are beneath the Kavod of a man they consider to have been the Gadol HaDor. So when someone like R’ Kamenetsky published those things in his book, Making
of a Gadol, it was banned. Apparently the Kotler family felt it was
disparaging to say that about their patriarchal figure.
R’ Kamenetsky argued that even if these were negative
things about him, that he overcame them makes him a far more inspirational figure
than if he was born Kodesh Merechem – holy from the womb. But to no avail. His book was banned because it told a truth
that was unacceptable to his family. A family that are adherents of the current Charedi
Hashkafa.
Honoring the family’s wishes is one thing. But the net result is perpetuating
the falsehood that a Gadol would never do things like that - when in fact he did. God forbid one of
their adherents decide to pick up a classic novel and read it, or worse write a letter to his fiancé.
Professor Marc Shapiro has gone to great lengths to uncover
and publish these truths which have been omitted by the right for purposes of
furthering their agenda. He has in fact
written a few books demonstrating how agendas have caused lies of omission to
be promoted as truth. Even in a book as sacred as R’ Yosef Karo’s Shulchan Aruch:
In discussing the pre-Yom Kippur ritual of kaparot , in which one’s sins are symbolically transferred to a chicken, Karo refers to the practice as a “foolish custom.” (Other authorities went further, calling it a pagan practice.) Although that comment appeared in the first 18 printings of the work, it disappeared in the 18th century and is still generally omitted — a decision based on the fact that kaparot is now a normative Jewish observance.
Lying by omission was clearly intended to forward an agenda.
One that strives to defend a practice now observed by many –mostly Chasidic
Jews. One which was clearly labeled by the Shulchan Aruch as foolish at the minimum.
“If Karo is not safe from censorship,” Shapiro writes, ”I daresay that no text is safe.”
Rewriting history to serve an agenda
is just plain wrong. Even if one’s motives for doing so are pure. One
cannot learn from history if it is hidden from them. One can then only learn
from the history deemed beneficial for the cause.
I understand that family
sensitivity needs to be honored. But that has to be weighed against the effects
of omitting truths that - though unflattering - can teach something about the
real values of a religious hero instead of the values projected onto them by
the current Charedi Zeitgeist.
Professor Shapiro said, such omissions calls into question
other aspects of religious beliefs and traditions that may not have been
historically the case.
 |
| Agudah spokesman, Rabbi Avi Shafran |
However, when contemporary decisions are made based clearly
on agendas, that is another story. Bans of books about history and science that
contradict the Charedi worldview do not have the same force as the Rambam’s 13 principles
of faith. Modern day bans are agenda laden. The 13 principles of faith are not.
They are the carefully constructed wisdom of some of the greatest theological minds
in Jewish history and should be honored accordingly. Which is why I firmly
believe that those 13 principles are a requirement of faith and those that do not
believe in all of them, may in fact be heretics.
