 |
| Temple Menorah in Chicago is now a Chabad day school for girls |
Today, Open Orthodoxy has more in common with the small minority of Conservative Jews who are halachically observant than either group has with its home denomination. They may disagree about the extent of women’s leadership and the exact details of legal change, but both groups have a notion of binding-but-evolving religious law, traditional observance of Shabbat and kashrut, and the value of contemporary moral reasoning. The two groups are so marginal within their respective denominations that they really should just band together…
This is what many of us to the right of OO have been saying
for quite some time. And OO’s de-legitimization as an Orthodox movement has been
formalized in a proclamation by the Agudah Moetzes.
Although that was not the main point in his column, I think
it should be emphasized. OO has more in common with the Conservative Movement ideologically - than it does with Orthodoxy. Which is why anything coming out of this movement
should not be seen as legitimately Orthodox either. Which makes the RCA’s
rejection of its rabbis - both male and female - the right approach.
But what about the rest of Michaleson’s article. Does that
have any merit? I think it does. His point being that denominational turf wars
don’t matter anymore. He sees so many denominational breakdowns across the entire
spectrum of Judaism - and so much overlap - that it is almost impossible to
place oneself into any given category. I agree with him to a certain extent. It is true across much of heterodoxy.
But it is also true Hashkaficly within Orthodoxy. There are a lot of different Hashkafos within it – and a
lot of overlap: Sephardi Jews and Askenazi Jews; Israeli Charedim and American
Charedim; Dati Leumi Jews in Israel and Modern Orthodox Jews in America… And
what about Chardalim? They are Dati Leumi Jews that - but for their knitted
Kipot and Religious Zionism - are as Charedi as their non (anti?) Zionist Charedi
counterparts.
Are these differences really significant in how we lead our
lives or raise our families? I don’t think so. Let us look at my
Hashkafos. I am Modern Orthodox. But as a Centrist I probably have more in
common with moderate Charedim than I do with the Modern Orthodox left wing (even
before they morphed into OO). With so many differences among us - it is not
always easy to find one’s denominational or Hashkafic home.
So why have labels at all? I would have preferred the pre
modern appellation: Jews. We are all Jews. But are we not entitled to have different perspectives
about our faith based on our individuality and background? Of course we are, so
long as they are Halachic, none heretical, and fall generally within the parameters of tradition. Those that fall outside of those walls - would be
individuals. Not movements. There would be no turf wars. That’s how
it used to be.
But now there are movements. Movements founded by people
that wanted to divide rather than unite. I lament the advent of any movement.
But now that they are here and have set up their own guidelines it is important
to know which ones fall within the walls of the traditional Judaism handed down
through the generations - and which don’t. Some, like the Chasidim have stayed on track. Others, like the Reform have not - veering off that track deliberately. And some (like OO and the
Conservative Movement) claim to be on that track are nevertheless rejected by
the mainstream.
People searching for truth need to know the differences and have
a right to know how each denomination sees the other. We cannot therefore blur those
distinctions.
But there are some distinctions we can do away with. At least sociologically. And it’s already happening. While there are significant Hashkafic differences between
Chasidim, the Yeshiva world, and Centrists, there is a melting pot phenomenon talking
place which is mainstream and becoming unified. It is the largest segment of
Orthodoxy. I’ve discussed it here many times and it consists of Moderate
Charedim and Centrists.
As time passes these Hashkafic differences will become less
important as our lifestyles will become more similar. There will eventually hardly
be any noticeable difference in how we lead our lives. Resistance to ‘melting pot’ by the hardcore right
not withstanding - as more people from the right seek better lives for their families.
Hashkafic differences won’t matter. Not that Hashklafos aren’t important.
They are. But getting along as a unified Orthodoxy is far more important.
What about those Hashkafic differences? Will they exist at all? Will
they have no influence in our future? I do believe they will. If I had
to guess, I would say that we will all influence each other Hashkafically
somewhat and perhaps arrive at a new Hashkafa that see the various truth in all
Hashkafos.
This is my view of American Orthodoxy in the future. Israel
is an entirely different discussion. But even there, I think things will eventually
change towards a more homogeneous society since sustaining the current Charedi educational
structure there is highly unlikely.
What about denominations outside of Orthodoxy? Maybe it won’t
happen in my lifetime. But for reasons beyond the scope of this post - I think they
will eventually become extinct. The handwriting is on the wall. So many of their Shuls and temples are already closing - or being sold off to Orthodox groups.
