Ex-CDC Chief Tom Freiden appearing before a House committee yesterday (CNN) |
Obviously health is of paramount importance. Saving lives come
first. Way ahead of money. This is why I have been scrupulously adhering to social
distancing, and wearing a mask and gloves when I go out.
I try as much as
possible to stay away from people. But I still need to buy food. Get
some fresh air and exercise while I’m at it. Other than that, I stay home. I am one of the more
fortunate people in the sense that I am retired and living on social security
and life savings. I do not need to work. All of my bills get paid.
But a lot of people are not that lucky. They need income to put food on their table and pay their bills. For them, working is a necessity. Most people do not have enough savings to live on for months at a time. Not working creates an unbearable reality for them. With anxiety levels going through the roof! Mortgages don’t get
paid. And fear of losing one’s home with no where to go becomes a real possibility.
Being together in the same space with a spouse and children 24/7 can cause a lot of stress, too. And then there is monotony and boredom to the point of distraction - replacing a productive work schedule outside the home. Watching the daily media
reports all of which seem so pessimistic does not help matters. Under such conditions, every day can become increasingly unbearable. Especially if there is no end in sight. It’s is easy to see how anyone
can become depressed. And in some cases even suicidal. I believe that suicides have
gone up dramatically since COVID -19 hit us.
How many lives will be lost by keeping the economy closed indefinitely, people staying home, not working, and unable to pay their bills,
with no end in sight?
This is why I get upset when I hear people making health versus the economy comparisons. People will die either way. It is unclear, however, which is
worse. What will the numbers be? Will more people die because we open the country
back up? Or will more people die because we don’t? I don’t think we really know.
A way must be found where we can at least more or less even up the odds. The country needs to open back up. But with clear and
enforceable safety precautions in place to minimize the spread of the disease.
The
actual steps that need to be taken are beyond my pay-grade. Former CDC Chief Tom Freiden whose predictions have been dire offered his own plan on how to proceed opening up the economy.
Whatever we end up doing, I assume that it will continue to involve wearing masks in public and practicing social
distancing. It will also require a lot more
testing and contact tracing so that those that have inadvertently come into
contact with an infected but asymptomatic carrier can self quarantine – with substantial
penalties of they don’t. And it will require a maximum effort to find a vaccine so that we can eventually return to normal.
Meanwhile, I have been listening to briefings by Illinois Governor Pritzker and his health advisors where every day new infection and death number are reported. That so many new
deaths are reported every day because of COVID-19 is about as scary as it gets for
me.
However, one thing that has been missing from these reports is the condition of those that have
died. During yesterday’s briefing, those deaths were put something like this: 136 people died where COVID-19 was a factor.
A factor?! That made me wonder how many of those deaths were by people
with underlying health issues? My guess is that the vast majority of deaths reported are not purely from COVID-19. Which
might very well mean that that those that died from COVID-19 alone is very
small. I say ‘might’ - because I don’t really
know.
It would, however, be helpful to know that if we are ever able to
return to anything remotely resembling a full employment economy. Because then
the prudent thing to do would be to require only those with underlying health
conditions to stay home. While the rest of us are allowed to go back to work albeit with
the above-mentioned testing and safety precautions.
I also wonder how the COVID-19 numbers compare to the common
flu? Is the death rate similar? Are underlying health issues the same kind
of factor there as they are with COVID-19?
And what about the age factor? We know that the elderly are
more vulnerable. The older, the more vulnerable. But age also brings on underlying
health conditions. It is true that a lot
more elderly people died – especially in nursing homes. But it’s also very
possible that it was not age itself - but underlying health of those elderly that was a
major factor in their death.
These are important questions that I have not heard
addressed. But I believe they are of paramount importance.
This does not mean we can just treat this pandemic like the
flu. For which there is a vaccine. But it will tells us about the relative
danger to healthy people that catch it.
We already know that there are a lot of people
that are contagious and never have any symptoms. We already know that the
vast majority of people have symptoms recover. And we know that the
majority of people that die have underlying health conditions. On the other hand, we also know that there
have been a lot of otherwise very healthy young people – with no underlying health
conditions that have gotten very sick and in some cases have died!
I want to be clear. I am not God forbid trying to open up
the country without taking the necessary precautions I mentioned above. – and whatever
else our health officials recommend. All of which should be enforceable. I am only
asking questions that at least for me, have not been answered. And which I think
are important for all of us to know before we go forward.