Baruch Dayan HaEmes, Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm, OBM (YU archives) |
I had always valued the importance of studying
worldly knowledge along with the study of Torah. But I had never crystallized
exactly what the relationship between the two was aside from a deep feeling that
worldly knowledge was an important part of life. I felt that ignoring or minimizing it would be at our own peril.
Rabbi Lamm provided that connection in his seminal work,
Torah U’Mada. It was clear from his introduction that he too had some questions
about that connection. And since Torah
U’Mada (TUM) was the motto and logo of YU (Yeshiva University), the institution he presided over, he
took it upon himself to define that concept as best as humanly possible.. He believed that TUM should mean more than simply
having the two disciplines in the same building. (Which is how Rav Hershel
Schachter characterized it when Rabbi Lamm approached him about his thoughts.)
It was
with his great intellect and intellectual honesty that he developed severall
models uopon which Torah U’Mada could be based. All of which resonated with me.
In the attempts to get as wide a range of opinion on the subject he asked for input from several prominent Orthodox thinkers. One of whom was my own Rebbe, Rav Ahron Soloveitchk. Who did a masterful job in providing his own perspective in two essays on the subject.
In the attempts to get as wide a range of opinion on the subject he asked for input from several prominent Orthodox thinkers. One of whom was my own Rebbe, Rav Ahron Soloveitchk. Who did a masterful job in providing his own perspective in two essays on the subject.
Sadly Rabbi Lamm’s book was not well received by the rest of the Yeshiva world. (Not that YU was ever given respect by the right. But that is another subject.)
One of TUM’s harshest critics were adherents of Rav Shamshon Raphael Hirsch’s Torah Im Derech Eretz (TIDE). They had their own reasons for asserting the importance of studying Mada and did not want people to confuse it with TUM - which they rejected.
That had always
bothered me since he actually included TIDE as one of his models although
admitting that it was not a perfect fit - preferring another
model he felt more closely followed his philosophy. Personally I see them as two versions connecting Torah to Mada - each being a legitimate approach (Elu
V”Elu - if you will). But I digress.
Even though he was educated in one of their Yeshivos (Torah Vodaath) before moving on to become a student at YU, (or perhaps because of it) Rabbi. Lamm was a controversial figure to the world of the
right. Aside from their rejection of TUM, he was viciously attacked for a variety of other reasons. For me, two of the most memorable were from Philidelphia Rosh HaYeshiva, Rav Elya
Svei and Telshe Rosh HaYeshiva, Rav Mordechai Gifter.
Rav Svei had some choice words for Dr. Lamm about a speech accusing him of calling
right wing Yeshiva students cavemen. Which was a gross mischaracterization of
what Rabbi Lamm had said about them.
Rav Gifter strongly criticized Rabbi Lamm for permitting ‘gay clubs’ in his alma
mater. (R’ Gifter had attended YU as a student.) Rabbi. Lamm’s response was as
follows:
“To deny gay clubs the right to function would be to deny Yeshiva University its right to exist. We have no intention of closing our doors over this ... It is more important [to keep the clubs so] our school stays open.”
Since YU had become non-sectarian so that it could qualify
for government funding, he had to follow their rules. Or in the alternative shut
down the school for lack of funding. Rav Gifter felt he should have shut the school rather
than tolerate any form gay activity.
But no one questioned his loyalty to the school and his
natural ability to lead it, both intellectually, religiously, and financially. Rabbi Lamm was a Talmid Chacham, a scholar, and widely respected pulpit rabbi even
before he accepted the leadership role at YU. A brilliant thinker, a consummate
speaker, and a magnificent fundraiser.
After taking the job as President of YU, he brought it from a serious
deficit to a surplus by the time he retired at age 75. He gave the position the intellectual and religious heft
it needed to be both a Yeshiva and a university. I truly admired him and will
forever be grateful for what he has given me.
Rabbi Lamm was a towering giant of great
intellect, whose dominance and influence on the world of Torah U’Mada has yet
to be matched. Yehi Zichro Baruch.