Friday, April 24, 2026

Challenges to Morality by LGBTQ Advocacy

A few years ago, Rabbi Efrem Goldberg gave a talk about transgenderism in the Jewish community. In it, he described a devoutly religious, middle-aged male member of his shul who approached him and said he had struggled with this issue his entire life. He believed he was a woman despite being born in a man’s body and felt he could no longer continue living as a man. He asked a shaila (a halachic question) about whether he could change his sex.

Needless to say, rabbis do not often receive a shaila like this—or so I thought. I was surprised to hear Rabbi Goldberg say that when he brought the question to a recognized, world-class posek, he was told that he receives this shaila several times a week.

Rabbi Goldberg then went on to discuss sources suggesting that transgenderism is not a new phenomenon, beginning with the creation of Adam, who was initially created both male and female in one body.

His point was that we should approach this issue with sympathy. People who struggle with it should not be ridiculed or ostracized. They should be treated with the same loving-kindness we extend to anyone facing challenges beyond their control. This, he emphasized, is the Torah’s way.

This has always been my view. But it is decidedly not the view of general culture. Many have concluded that the only humane way to treat transgender people is to regard their identities as entirely normal and to celebrate their choices. Choices they are - in a free society - entitled to make.

That is not, of course, the Torah’s perspective. What Rabbi Goldberg did not say is that it is permitted for a person to change his or her sex. According to Jewish law, it is forbidden. It is also forbidden for a person to live as a member of the opposite sex even without surgery. Cross-dressing is explicitly prohibited by the Torah.

Whether an exception could be made for someone who might be suicidal if unable to transition is a question I do not believe has yet been fully addressed by qualified poskim. It is also unclear whether threats of suicide - or the high rates of suicide among transgender individuals - would qualify as pikuach nefesh. A life and death issue which can override Torah prohibitions.

This approach differs significantly from the current progressive societal view, which does not take biblical values into account and often discards them as inhumane. Advocacy groups such as LGBTQ organizations argue that people should be free to live as they wish: “Who are they hurting? Let people be who they want to be.”

Religious people see it differently. It is one thing to empathize with human suffering; it is another to celebrate behavior long considered outside the norm as fully normative.

In a First Things article, Carl R. Trueman, professor of biblical and religious studies at Grove City College, discusses both the positive changes and the ongoing challenges facing those who continue to value morality as defined by the Bible. A framework that guided society for thousands of years until things began to change in the mid 20th century... 

To continue reading - and/or to comment on this post  - click on this link: substack. You must subscribe to receive new posts. It's easy and it's free.  

Disqus