An article in the Wall Street Journal reports that the
upcoming Asifah on safe internet use has already been sold out. The capacity of Citi Field Stadium - which they have rented for this event is 42,000. This should not surprise anyone who has been paying
attention. The organizers have been pushing this event hard! So hard in fact that
in one reported case, a relatively moderate Charedi school has required all fathers and their sons to pay the ten dollar per seat admission charge to
attend. I have no doubt that other
schools have done the same.
I say fathers and sons because women have been barred for modesty
reasons. Charedim tend to have separate seating for men and women at their
large public events. Chasidim have an added requirement of a Mechitza. Without
it they will not attend such an event.
Building one for this event would be cost prohibitive. I can
understand this since the upcoming Agudah Siyum HaShas has spent about a half
million dollars to construct one for their event. Were women allowed to attend, the potential
attendance would be at least double that number. I guess 2 million dollars is their limit.
Internet porn is a serious problem but not THAT serious! Women can watch in on
the internet via a live stream. But I
digress.
But there is something else happening that day. From the Journal:
A counterprotest—dubbed "The Internet Is Not the
Problem" and expected to draw hundreds—is scheduled for across the
street from the stadium event. It accuses Jewish leadership of scapegoating the
Internet while avoiding a more pressing problem: child abuse.
In my view the attendance numbers ought to be reversed. I
know about the dangers of the internet. I know all the pluses of proper use and
minuses of misuse. I even applaud the new Charedi approach that realizes bans don’t
work. They now want to educate people on how to use it safely - even though I still
disagree with their characterization of it as an evil medium that one would be
better off without. But that is not the subject of this post.
I am once again thoroughly disgusted by how certain Chasidim
- like Satmar - deal with sex abuse. It is out of the dark ages. I am not only
disgusted but angry. I am angry at a culture that is described in detail in a lengthy front page article in the New York Times. What has evolved is a culture of pouring salt on an open
wound – in the name of Torah.
When abuse happens in this community the operative word is “Hush”.
This article validates every word of Judy Brown’s book of the same name. Every
effort is made to bury an abuse form the public consciousness. Anyone who makes
an abuse accusation against a fellow Chasid is told to keep it quiet for their
own good and the good of the community.
If an accusation is made public by a victim or his family,
he is shunned. If it is reported to a secular authority it is considered
Mesirah - informing on a Jew to evil secular authorities. This is a sin that in
theory is punishable by death. Although no one is physically harmed by exposing
an abuser there is a spiritual death imposed. If one becomes a victim’s
advocate or active in trying to stop abuse in any public way - like encouraging
victims to come forward and report abuse - they are put in Cherem! Being a Moser (an informant) is a far worse crime than
being a sex abuser. From the Times:
By cooperating with the police, and speaking out about his
son’s abuse, Mr. Jungreis, 38, found himself at the painful forefront of an
issue roiling his insular Hasidic community. There have been glimmers of change
as a small number of ultra-Orthodox Jews, taking on longstanding religious and
cultural norms, have begun to report child sexual abuse accusations against
members of their own communities. But those who come forward often encounter
intense intimidation from their neighbors and from rabbinical authorities,
aimed at pressuring them to drop their cases.
Abuse victims and their families have been expelled from
religious schools and synagogues, shunned by fellow ultra-Orthodox Jews and
targeted for harassment intended to destroy their businesses.
As the 64 year old mother of a man abused as a child in a
Satmar school said:
“There is no nice way of saying it… Our community protects
molesters. Other than that, we are wonderful.”
Can anyone say, Hush? This is exactly the way the book Hush
described the situation in the Chasidic community in which she was raised. (Not
Satmar.)
What is the most important value in this community?
Reputation. That supersedes all else with respect to abuse. The spiritual murder of one of their own
does not merit the ruining of their reputation. They either still do not understand the consequences
of sweeping allegations under the rug, or they do but think that ruining the
life of a victim by their silence is a price worth paying. This way they keep
up their image of a pure and pristine example of Judaism that does not have
these kinds of problems.
What about the victim? Well, they will take care of him or
her. Often it will be in the form of being told to just get over it and get on with
their lives.
And then they offer their daughters’ hands in marriage to
these victims. And I have a bridge to sell you.
The fault lies in the Rebbe – the spiritual head of their
Chasidic sect. These larger than life icons are so venerated that no amount of
evidence or logic will counter their opinions. Chasidic Rebbes are
treated like virtual royalty – kings in fact. One need not go very far to see
just how loyal Chasidim are to their Rebbe. Go to any wedding of Chasidic
Rebbe’s child. An event with 20,000 Chasidic attendees is not that uncommon for
larger sects like Satmar. One can find videos
of these events online. It is a sight to behold.
It is the Rebbe that controls the culture by dictating its
rules. If he says that reporting a molester is Mesirah, end of conversation.
If a Chasidic school is told by thir Rebbe to retain a teacher who was accused by a victim of
abuse… he must know what he is doing since he is God’s true spokesman here on earth.
The Rebbe said let him continue to teach. He teaches. What about future victims?
There will be no future victims because the Rebbe knows what he is doing. How
dare anyone say otherwise?
One can speculate as to why they cast someone who has reported
an abuser to the authorities as a Moser. Some of it is an irrational fear of
secular authorities. Their parents and grandparents brought such fears with
them from Europe when they immigrated here. There - the fear was legitimate. But
conditions here are so radically different that most non Chasidic Poskim
do not see reporting a molester to the authorities as Mesirah. Chasidic communities are so insular, they have no other
frame of reference but what their parents and grandparents told them about
secular authorities. Chasidic Rebbes perpetuate that fear applying it to secular authorities here. It then becomes part of the very essence of their beliefs.
Some might cynically say it is about Rebbes retaining power
and control. Many of them do after all preside over millions of dollars of assets in cash
and property. I can certainly understand the desire to remain king. It’s good
to be king.
But I would not go that far. I’m sure that most of these Rebbes are good people who want to do good things for their people. And in most cases they do. But it is no less a fact that power is retained this way.
But I would not go that far. I’m sure that most of these Rebbes are good people who want to do good things for their people. And in most cases they do. But it is no less a fact that power is retained this way.
I feel sorry for a community that has been so thoroughly brainwashed
that they actually believe that the greater good is served by protecting
molesters rather than healing their victims. It prevents them from doing the kinds of things that
would protect their children.
One of the fringe benefits of extreme insularity is that it keeps them loyal to their “king”. It keeps them all on the same page of irrational thought. And it encourages practices that are harmful to sex abuse victims and their families. They are therefore never confused by the facts. Because they cannot possibly know them unless they break the rules.
One of the fringe benefits of extreme insularity is that it keeps them loyal to their “king”. It keeps them all on the same page of irrational thought. And it encourages practices that are harmful to sex abuse victims and their families. They are therefore never confused by the facts. Because they cannot possibly know them unless they break the rules.
The result of all that is the sickening state of affairs
described in the Times!