Ariel Sharon and Rav Ahron Soloveichik |
Ariel Sharon
was a truly great man. He was a man whose sole purpose in life was to serve the
Jewish people. And he did so with great valor and distinction in his capacity
as a general in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). He was considered a brilliant military strategist
- often referred to as the Israeli ‘Patton’. To just cite one example of his military
prowess - he was actually able to pull victory from the jaws of defeat during
the Yom Kippur War. Egypt pulled off a surprise attack against Israel on Yom
Kippur of 1973. General Sharon was somehow able to encircle Egypt’s third army
and nearly enter Cairo before a truce called a halt to his
advances.
He was also
considered the ‘father’ of the settler movement. In the early days after the 1967
Six Day War, Israel decided to set up settlements on their newly captured
territory of Yehuda and Shomron (on the
West Bank of the Jordan River) and in Gaza. They believed that these
settlements would act as permanent buffers to attacks by their belligerent Arab
neighbors with an eye towards annexation.
Some of the larger settlements near the so
called ‘green line’ that delineates Israel’s pre 6 day war from the territories
captured have grown to become fairly
large and successful cities. The Gaza Strip was one of those settlements. Sharon
was extremely popular among settlers – most of which were Religious Zionists that
believed they had a messianic mission to resettle all of biblical Israel. When
Sharon would visit them, they would start singing a popular Hebrew song called ‘
Dovid, Melech Yisroel’ (David, King of Israel)... and was literally carried on
their shoulders while they danced to this song! This is how fond they were of him.
After a
controversial period of service under the Begin administration, Sharon left the
military for politics and became a member of the right wing Likud Party (the party
currently in power). This party espoused his ‘winner take all’ philosophy of
settling and retaining all the captured territories.
It is interesting to note that Rav Ahron Soloveichik was among those who believed that it was forbidden to return any recaptured parts of Eretz Yisroel to the Arabs under any circumstances and that doing so would endanger the lives of its citizens. As such he was a natural ally of the settler movement and people like Sharon – whose family incidentally stemmed from Lithuanian area of Brisk in Europe. Sharon was in fact the keynote speaker at the Brisk Yeshiva International Banquet held in New York.
It is interesting to note that Rav Ahron Soloveichik was among those who believed that it was forbidden to return any recaptured parts of Eretz Yisroel to the Arabs under any circumstances and that doing so would endanger the lives of its citizens. As such he was a natural ally of the settler movement and people like Sharon – whose family incidentally stemmed from Lithuanian area of Brisk in Europe. Sharon was in fact the keynote speaker at the Brisk Yeshiva International Banquet held in New York.
But then
something strange happened. Ariel Sharon became the prime minister of Israel. He
eventually broke away from Likud to form
a new party, Kadima because of Likud’s stiff opposition to giving away any land
to the Palestinians.
Sharon
correctly viewed the growing Palestinian demographic as a threat to the very
Jewish nature of the state. If things were left as they were, Palestinians
would soon reach a majority and vote themselves into power. He was faced with a
dilemma. He could either annex the West Bank and cease to be a democracy… or
detach the growing Palestinian demographic from Israel. To the great
consternation of his former political and settler allies, he chose the latter.
Unable to
reach any kind of peace settlement with Palestinians, he quickly decided to
unilaterally withdraw from those areas – starting with Gaza. Settlers went from
calling him the ‘King’of Israel’ to calling him a traitor. What followed was
one of the most gut-wrenching periods in the modern state of Israel’s
relatively young history. In August of 2005, the Gaza Strip was evacuated. Settlers
were initially urged to leave voluntarily and to the best of my knowledge the few
that did that did were given new homes. But many stayed and passively resisted leaving
as military troops had to virtually drag them out of their homes. Although all were promised new homes - some
are still waiting for them 8 years later.
What’s worse
is that Gaza was eventually taken over by the radical terrorist Hamas that has
been firing rockets into Israel ever since.
It’s easy to
look at the disengagement from Gaza with 20/20 hindsight. It was obviously a
mistake. But we can only know that with that 20/20 hindsight we have. In my view Sharon had no choice. He had to
give Palestinians Gaza. It was in fact an experiment to see if they would take Gaza
and live peacefully with Israel. The opposite happened.
In light of
this - giving Palestinians the West Bank now would be a mistake of historic proportion.
I was in favor of land for peace. I believe that lives are worth more than
land. If a true peace would have resulted, it would have been worth it. But I now know that the West Bank would very likely end up the same way Gaza did. Which
would make Israel a far more dangerous
place to live and threaten it existentially!
Had we not given them Gaza, they would all still be claiming to give peace a chance. Well, we did. And look what happened. I think this very sobering fact is being over-looked by Secretary of State John Kerry and his boss, the President, in their overly zealous pursuit of peace in the region.
Had we not given them Gaza, they would all still be claiming to give peace a chance. Well, we did. And look what happened. I think this very sobering fact is being over-looked by Secretary of State John Kerry and his boss, the President, in their overly zealous pursuit of peace in the region.
Sharon
should not be condemned for giving Palestinians Gaza. He should be praised for
his courage in going against the grain of his own ideologues and ‘throwing down
the gauntlet’!
There are
some who would say that it is a good thing Sharon had a stroke before he did to
the West Bank what he did to Gaza. I disagree and find that notion appalling. I
do not think Sharon would have done that after seeing what happened in Gaza. He
was too dedicated to the welfare of his people to do anything like that.
The day
Sharon died was a sad day for Israel. They… we… have lost a great leader. A man
of conviction, vision, and strength. A
man who loved his people and his country. A man who had the courage to fight
his enemies in battle and his critics in politics in the cause of serving his
people. Baruch Dayan HaEmes.