Rabbi Shlomo Riskn, current Chief Rabbi of Efrat |
I am sure that Rabbi Riskin’s large core of supporters will challenge me. They will say it is
not Rabbi Riskin whose demise we are watching, but the Israeli Chief Rabbinate.
They will say that the Rabbinate is the one that has moved out of the
mainstream by coming under the influence (if not outright control) of the
Charedi rabbinic leadership in Israel. While I agree that the Rabbinate has
moved in a rightward direction that is influenced by Charedi Rabbonim, I am not
convinced that their motivations with respect to Rabbi Riskin are
necessarily a refection of that. From
JTA:
The Chief Rabbinate has declined to automatically renew Riskin’s appointment and has summoned him for a hearing on the matter on June 29.
Rabbi Riskin is defiant. He says he will remain Chief Rabbi no matter what the Rabbinate decides. For as long as the Efrat community wants him.
Rabbi Riskin has been the Chief Rabbi of the West Bank city
of Efrat since 1983 when he co-founded it. Before that he was the founding rabbi of Lincoln Square Synagogue (LSS).
There is not a doubt in my mind that his
contributions to Klal Yisroel are vast. He was an eloquent defender of Orthodoxy against Reform and
Conservative Judaism. His principled
view of living in Eretz Yisroel moved him to make Aliyah in the middle of a
highly successful career.There he built a community of devoted citizens that absolutely adore him.
His commitment to Orthodoxy had always included the recognition
that there were rabbis greater than he. Chief
among them - his Rebbe and mentor, Rav Yoshe Ber Soloveitchik (RYBS). He also consulted with R’ Moshe Feinstein
and the Lubavitcher Rebbe. He always consulted with the likes of these great rabbis before embarking on
ambitious projects designed to advance the cause of Orthodoxy.
Although there were some things about him that I saw as
controversial (like his penchant for psychoanalyzing the Patriarchs of Judaism)
I gave him a pass because of those overwhelming and indisputable contributions.
But as Gil Student points out – Rabbi Riskin has changed. He
no longer feels the need to consult. And some of his programs have surpassed by
far any possible approval from his Rebbe and mentor, RYBS. Like his decision to
start ordaining women. Or his aggressive embrace of Christianity to the point
of making flattering comments about Jesus in his attempt to increase and
enhance Christian support of Israel and the Jewish people.
And then there is the sticky issue of conversions. Rabbi
Riskin seems to feel that this is the primary issue that the rabbinate has with
him. He disagrees with their requirement that all conversion should be done through
them. And that only those conversions will be recognized as legitimate. Rabbi Riskin believes that conversions should
be allowed by local municipal rabbinical courts not subject to the rabbinate
whose conversion standards vary.
His reasons are pure. He believes that the Rabbinate’s
requirements are too strict for purposes of converting the masses of Russian
immigrants who were born of a Jewish father but not a Jewish mother. There are
Halachic opinions that allow for leniencies in such cases. And he feels that because
of the demographic time bomb that these immigrants represent, every
leniency should be employed even if they are no longer accepted by the
mainstream.
I’m not here to judge who is
right and who is wrong as I am not qualified to do so. What I will say is that matters of converting
to Judaism should not be taken lightly. And that matters of state cannot
supersede Halacha.
I suspect that this Rabbi Riskin may be right about why the
Rabbinate is now reluctant to renew his status as Chief Rabbi of Efrat. But
even without that, there is ample reason to question what he is doing in those
other areas. One cannot look at past accomplishments. One must look at what
that person is about now. One must make judgements about fitness based on the
present. Not the past.
I agree with Gil. Rabbi Riskin has changed. It is a change that
clearly includes a radical agenda. I don’t blame the Rabbinate for carefully
reviewing his fitness for the post. Radical agendas are not what Judaism is
about. This is the new Rabbi Riskin. I miss the old one.