Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Feminism Versus Tradition

Orthodox Women in Medicine (TOI)
When it comes to the Charedi world (especially in this country), one of the most important developments of the 20th century is the advent of feminism.

This may sound counterintuitive, but the truth is that the lifestyle of full-time Torah study by Charedi men could not have been sustained without it. The feminist push for equal rights for women enabled women to pursue lucrative careers - earning enough to relieve their husbands of the responsibility to support the family. In most cases, Charedi women have become the breadwinners. Feminism opened the door to careers that were formerly closed to women.

This, of course, has turned traditional Jewish values on their head. In Judaism, the roles for men and women are traditionally very structured: men are supposed to support their families, while women are meant to take care of the home, raise the children, and nurture them. In my view, the children are often getting short shrift in this arrangement. There is simply not enough time for a mother to devote to her children if she is, for example, a cardiothoracic surgeon whose life-saving services are in constant demand and cannot be delayed.

The point is that a win for feminism (the byproduct of which is a win for the Kollel lifestyle) is not necessarily a win for the family. This is not to say it is impossible to ‘chew gum and walk’. But rather that sometimes great success comes with collateral damage. In this case the casualty of feminism’s victories is that many women who choose demanding careers delay having children, sometimes well into their 40s. While women in their forties can still have children, the chances for a healthy child decrease with age. The solution for many is to freeze their eggs while still in their 20s, when fertility is highest and the likelihood of healthy births is greater. Those eggs are then fertilized and implanted much later in life. The problem is, this doesn’t always work for various reasons. In more than a few cases those women are not even married and use donor sperm.  And if the pregnancy takes (which is not always the case - they become single mothers. Depriving their child of the full family experience that includes having a father.

Ironically, what was once predicted in the 1960s to be an unmanageable ‘population explosion’ many decades hence - has gone in the opposite direction. The U.S. population is shrinking. We are not replacing ourselves at the current rate of 1.6 children per family.

As an aside this negatively affects the financial stability of a large and aging population (baby boomers like me), whose social security benefits are funded by a shrinking workforce. In other words - the math doesn’t work.

What feminism has done, in my view, is erode the traditional roles of men and women and contribute to a decline in U.S. birth rates. Many women no longer place high enough value on their primary roles as mothers and homemakers to make them the central priority of their lives. Careers take precedence over family, even if that means delaying motherhood and freezing their eggs to become mothers later - once their careers are in high gear.

Please don’t misunderstand me. I think it’s wonderful that women now have the opportunity to excel in careers that were once the exclusive domain of men. There is no reason a woman cannot become the top neurosurgeon in the world. Intellect, talent, and determination are not gender-specific. And I could not feel a greater sense of pride in my people when something like that happens. 

But still, something very valuable has been lost in the process. I have to wonder whether subordinating motherhood to career goals is worth the price.

I’m sure some will see my thoughts as sexist. I can’t control how people react. But I remain a strong believer in equal pay for equal work and in equal opportunity for men and women in any career they choose. That said, it cannot be denied - at least in my mind - that something major has been lost. The freedom to choose a lifestyle that precludes the primary role Judaism assigns to women of being an Akeres Habayis (the anchor of the home) and a 24/7 nurturing mother - may not be something to celebrate quite so uncritically.

Interestingly, out of concern for the declining birth rate, there is now a natalist movement in the U.S. that advocates for higher birth rates, prioritizes family formation, and de-emphasizes women’s careers. I don’t know how large this movement is, but if the U.S. wants to reverse the population decline, this would be a good place to start.

That, however, is not a problem the Charedi world faces. They are far ahead of the game in this regard. The only question is: what is a high-paying, time-consuming, family-supporting career doing to their children?

It would be interesting to get input from Kollel wives who have these kinds of careers. Anyone like that reading this -  I would love to hear from you.